In a group of nine persons it is not possible to choose four persons such that every one knows the three others. Prove that this group of nine persons can be partitioned into four groups such that nobody knows anyone from his or her group.
Problem
Source: Bulgarian IMO TST 2005, Day 2, Problem 3
Tags: graph theory, combinatorics proposed, combinatorics, Ramsey Theory
07.07.2013 14:19
In the language of graph theory: Let $G=(V,E)$ be a graph with $|V|=9$ that does not contain $K_4$ as a subgraph. Prove that $G$ is $4$-colorable. [Corrected.]
07.07.2013 15:57
... which is false if you drop the $|V|=9$ condition as manuel has.
05.04.2015 14:48
Any solution? I tried this for three hours but in vain. Superhard!
10.04.2015 17:24
Here is my simple, low-tech solution to this difficult problem. More elegant or technical solutions are welcome. We consider a graph with vertices representing the people. The edge $\overline{v_iv_j}$ is blue when people $i$ and $j$ know each other, and red otherwise. The problem is equivalent to showing that the edge-induced subgraph of blue edges in $K_9$ is $4$-colorable. We start with a lemma. Lemma. The edges of $K_6$ are colored red or blue in such a way that there is no blue $K_4$ and if $B_6$ is the edge-induced subgraph of blue edges, then $\chi \left (B_6 \right) > 3$. Then all the red edges of $K_6$ form a cycle of length $5$. Proof. We first claim that under conditions of the lemma, there is no red $K_3$. It is well known that $R(3,3) = 6$ (see here for a proof), so there is a monochromatic $K_3$. Label the vertices of $K_6$ $v_1, v_2, \dots , v_6$. Suppose, for contradiction, that there is a red $K_3$, which, WLOG, we suppose is $v_1v_2v_3$. If some edge $\overline{v_iv_j}$, where $i,j \in \{4,5,6\}$, is red, then the $3$-partition $\{v_1,v_2,v_3 \}, \{v_i, v_j \}, \{v_k \}$, where $k \not \in \{1,2,3,i,j\}$, shows that $\chi (B_6) = 3$, which is forbidden. Hence $v_4v_5v_6$ is a blue $K_3$. $(\bigstar)$. Hence $\forall i \in \{1,2,3 \}, \exists j \in \{4,5,6\} \text{ such that } \overline{v_iv_j} \text{ is red}$, otherwise we would have a blue $K_4$. Suppose, WLOG, that $\overline{v_1v_4}, \overline{v_2v_4}$ are red. Then $v_1v_2v_4$ is a red $K_3$, so that $v_3v_5v_6$ is a blue $K_3$ from $(\bigstar)$. If now $\overline{v_3v_4}$ is blue, then $v_3v_4v_5v_6$ is a blue $K_4$. Otherwise, $\overline{v_3v_4}$ is red, and we have the $3$-partition $\{v_1,v_2,v_3,v_4\}, \{v_5\}, \{v_6\}$, so that $\chi (B_6) = 3$, and we have our contradiction. Therefore there is no red $K_3$, and our claim is true. We now show that all the red edges of $K_6$ form a cycle of length $5$. WLOG, let $\overline{v_1v_2}, \overline{v_3v_4}$ be red. If all edges $\overline{v_iv_j}$, where $i \in \{1,2\}, j \in \{3,4\}$ are red, then we have a $3$-partition $\{v_1, v_2, v_3,v_4\}, \{v_5\}, \{v_6\}$, which is forbidden. Hence, WLOG, let $\overline{v_2v_4}$ be blue. One of the edges in the vertex-induced subgraph $v_2v_4v_5v_6$ must be red: WLOG, let this be $\overline{v_4v_6}$. Then $\overline{v_3v_6}$ is blue (otherwise $v_3v_4v_6$ is a red $K_3$) and $\overline{v_3v_5}$ is blue (otherwise we have a $3$-partition $\{v_1, v_2\}, \{v_3, v_5 \}, \{v_4, v_6\}$). If $\overline{v_1v_3}$ is red, then $\overline{v_2v_5}$ must be blue and $\overline{v_2v_6}$ is red. Then $\overline{v_1v_6}, \overline{v_1v_5}, \overline{v_4v_5}, \overline{v_1v_4}$ are all blue, so our red edges are $\overline{v_1v_2}, \overline{v_2v_6}, \overline{v_6v_4}, \overline{v_4v_3}, \overline{v_3v_1}$, which form a cycle of length $5$. If $\overline{v_1v_3}$ is blue, then similar arguments produce a contradiction. Thus our proof of the lemma is complete. $\Box$ Consider now the complete graph $K_9$, with vertices $v_1, v_2, \dots , v_9$. It is well known that $R(3,4) = 9$ (see here for a proof), and since there is no blue $K_4$, there must be a red $K_3$. WLOG, we let $v_7v_8v_9$ be the red $K_3$. If the edge-induced subgraph of blue edges in the vertex-induced subgraph $v_1v_2 \dots v_6$ is $3$-colorable, then we are done. Otherwise, from the lemma, we can assume, WLOG, that $\overline{v_1v_2}, \overline{v_2v_3}, \overline{v_3v_4}, \overline{v_4v_5}, \overline{v_5v_1}$ are red. For $k \in \{7,8,9 \}$, we have four cases depending on how many of the $\overline{v_kv_6}$ are blue. Case 1. None of the $\overline{v_kv_6}$ are blue. Then we have the $4$-partition $\{v_6, v_7, v_8, v_9\}, \{v_1, v_2\}, \{v_3, v_4\}, \{v_5\}$. Case 2. Exactly one of the $\overline{v_kv_6}$ is blue (WLOG $\overline{v_7v_6}$). Then at least three of the edges $\overline{v_7v_i}$, for $i \in [1,5]$ are red, otherwise we have a blue $K_4$. WLOG, suppose $\overline{v_7v_i}$ is red when $i \in \{1,2,3\}$, so that we have a $4$-partition $\{ v_6, v_8, v_9\}, \{v_1, v_2, v_7\}, \{v_3, v_4\}, \{v_5\}$. Case 3. Exactly two of the $\overline{v_kv_6}$ are blue (WLOG $\overline{v_7v_6}, \overline{v_8v_6}$). Then as before, for $i \in [1,5]$ at least three of the $\overline{v_7v_i}$ and three of the $\overline{v_8v_i}$ are red. We can easily find the desired $4$-partition. Case 4. All the $\overline{v_kv_6}$ are blue. By similar arguments to before, we can find a $4$-partition. Hence the edge-induced subgraph of blue edges in $K_9$ is $4$-colorable, as required.