Given are distinct natural numbers $a$, $b$, and $c$. Prove that \[ \gcd(ab+1, ac+1, bc+1)\le \frac{a+b+c}{3}\]
Problem
Source:
Tags: modular arithmetic, quadratics, number theory proposed, number theory
23.07.2011 10:59
Say $0\leq a<b<c$. Let $d = \gcd(ab+1,bc+1,ca+1)$. We have $d \mid (ca+1) - (ab+1) = a(c-b)$, and since $\gcd(a,ab+1)=1$ it follows $d \mid c-b$. Similarly $d \mid b-a$, so $b=a+kd$, $c=b+\ell d$, thus $b\geq a+d$ and $c\geq b+d \geq a+2d$. It follows $\frac {a+b+c} {3} \geq a+d \geq d$. Equality can only occur if $a=0$, and then $d \mid a^2+1 = 1$, so $(a,b,c)=(0,1,2)$.
09.10.2011 08:16
another solution it's easy to prove that $d||b-c|,|c-a|,|a-b|$, let us suppose $a<b<c$,consider the contrary side and obtain $b-a,c-b>\frac{a+b+c}{3}$ adding them yields $c>5a+2b$,on the other hand, $2b>4a+c$ so $c>5a+2b>9a+c$,a contradiction!
31.12.2013 23:21
Here is yet a third solution to this very interesting problem. Let $\gcd(ab+1,ac+1,bc+1)=k$. Then $ab, bc, ca\equiv -1\pmod k$, so $(abc)^2\equiv -1\pmod k$. Now suppose $-1$ is a quadratic residue modulo $k$. Then there exists an integer $0\leq x\leq k-1$ such that $abc\equiv x\pmod k$. Since $ab\equiv -1\pmod k$, we have $abc\equiv -c\pmod k$, and as $k\nmid ab$ it follows that $c\equiv -x\pmod k$. Similarly, $a$ and $b$ are both congruent to $-x\pmod k$, so $a\equiv b\equiv c\pmod k$. Now WLOG let $a<b<c$. Then $b\geq a+k$ and $c\geq a+2k$, so \[a+b+c\geq a+(a+k)+(a+2k)=3a+3k\geq 3k,\] as desired.
24.11.2020 06:38
05.01.2022 08:31
Same as #4; posting for storage. Let $d=\gcd(ab+1,ac+1,bc+1)$ and WLOG let $a<b<c.$ Notice $$ab\equiv ac\equiv bc\equiv -1\pmod{d}$$so $a(b-c)\equiv 0\pmod{d}.$ We see $$\gcd(a,d)=\gcd(a,ab-1,ac-1,bc-1)=1$$so $b\equiv c\pmod{d}.$ Similarly, $a\equiv b\equiv c\pmod{d}$ and $a\le b+d\le c+2d.$ Substituting into $a+b+c$ yields the desired result. $\square$
26.03.2024 22:37
The problem is wrong!!!!! It should ask you to prove that the left side is strictly less than the right side, since, if the equality occurs, the smallest of the three numbers has to be 0, but 0 is not a natural number
26.03.2024 22:46
zuat.e wrote: The problem is wrong!!!!! It should ask you to prove that the left side is strictly less than the right side, since, if the equality occurs, the smallest of the three numbers has to be 0, but 0 is not a natural number But it don't makes problem wrong... If $x<y$ then condition $x \leq y$ is also right!
01.04.2024 00:46
Thanks, I didn't think about that, but come on, it's an olympiad, it should ask you to squeeze the problem to its maximum.
01.04.2024 09:02
I think in Russia $0$ is considered a natural number (I'm not entirely sure, so don't quote me on this)
30.11.2024 17:54
Small variation to #2: $$d \mid c(ab+1)-b(ac+1)=c-b.$$
30.11.2024 19:51
Let $g = \gcd(ab+1, ac+1, bc+1)$, and assume WLOG $a < b < c$. Note that $g \mid a-b, b-c$. If the statement doesn't hold, then we must have $2b> 4a+c, 2c>4b+a$ by $b-a, c-b > \frac{a+b+c}{3}$. But then $$2c > 4b+a = 2(2b)+a > 2(4a+c)+a = 2c+9a,$$contradiction. $\square$