Assume that there's some $m$ such that:
$b_{k}+b_{l} \neq m \ \forall k,l \in \mathbb{N}$
Case 1: $m=2n$ for some $n \in \mathbb{N}$
Consider the numbers $b_{1},b_{2},...,b_{n}$
Since $b_{0}=0, b_{i} \geq 1 \ \forall i \geq 1$
By our assumption, $b_{k} \neq 2n-b_{l} \ \forall k,l \in \mathbb{N} $
Thus $b_{1},b_{2},...,b_{n},2n-b_{1},2n-b_{2},...,2n-b_{n}$ are $2n$ pairwise distinct positive integers.
But each number is less than $2n$ which is clearly a contradiction.
Case 2: $m=2n+1$ for some $n \in \mathbb{N}$
Proceeding similar as above by considering
$b_{1},b_{2},...,b_{n+1},2n+1-b_{1},2n+1-b_{2},...,2n+1-b_{n+1}$ are $2n+2$ pairwise distinct positive integers where each number is less than $2n+2$.
(Note that $b_{i} \neq 2n+1$ because otherwise $b_{i}+b_{0}=2n+1$)
We also get a contradiction.
So the assumption is wrong in both cases and we're done.